About  |  Issues  |  Current issue  |  Submissions  |   Instructions for reviewers  |   Subscriptions  |   Partners  |  News  |  Academic indexing  |  Contact

Review article

Forest recovery following shifting cultivation: an overview of existing research [ 363-373 ]

Teegalapalli Karthik, Gopi G V and Prasanna K Samal

Abstract
Shifting cultivation is a predominant practice in the majority of tropical hilly tracts. Relatively few studies have examined forest recovery following shifting cultivation and we have reviewed these studies to identify and synthesize general recovery patterns. Most studies report that, although pioneer tree species recover relatively faster, woody biomass of mature forest trees recovers several decades after suspension of cultivation. Analysis of bird-species inventories in 10 studies revealed that up to 70% of mature forest birds may recover in successional sites and that species composition is about 55% similar to that in mature forests within 25 years. Results of mammal studies were likely to have been confounded by hunting effects and therefore the effect of time since suspension of cultivation and hunting impacts need to be investigated separately. As shown by a few studies, we conclude that community recovery can be expected to be accelerated when relatively large forest tracts adjoin a shifting cultivation landscape, in comparison with recovery in sites with shorter fallow cycles in the absence of contiguous forests, which act as sources for recolonization of fauna and vegetation.


Full Text PDF
General interest news article


General interest summaries (when available)
    English: Shifting cultivation is an agricultural system which involves a cultivation phase interspersed with a fallow phase that allows for forest regeneration. Recently, the practice has been identified as a global deforestation driver. In the following review, we have generalized findings of studies that have examined recovery of plants, birds and mammals following shifting cultivation. Research on vegetation recovery indicates that pioneer soft wood tree species recover relatively faster, however, mature forest tree species, particularly endemic species, recover several decades following suspension of cultivation. Most avifaunal studies report presence of several mature forest species in 25 year old successional sites and that at least 50% bird species were common between the two habitats. Results of mammal studies were likely to have been confounded by effects of hunting, a practice closely associated with shifting cultivation, and therefore future research on recovery of mammals must incorporate this factor. Based on findings of available studies, we conclude that community recovery can be expected to be accelerated when relatively large forest tracts adjoin a shifting cultivation landscape, in comparison with recovery in sites with shorter fallow cycles in the absence of contiguous forests, which act as sources for recolonization of fauna and vegetation.

    Español: En este trabajo los autores revisan el estado de conocimiento acerca de la restauración de la selva después del uso de la tierra para cultivos de temporal. Los autores indican que los cultivos de temporal son un factor de cambio importante en la destrucción de las selvas a nivel globa, pero que la practica provee de subsistencia a 300- 500 millones de habitantes en el planeta y esta íntimamente ligada a aspectos culturales, ecológicos y económicos de las comunidades. Sin embargo, los autores notan que las parcelas abandonadas despues de los cultivos de temporal muestran una recuperación mas rápida (en términos de áreas basales) y en acumulación de especies que otros tipos de parcelas modificadas por la actividad humana y posteriormente abandonadas, tales como pastizales, sitios de agroforestería y plantaciones. Los autores argumentan que la práctica de cultivos de temporal puede ser sustentable y conserva la biodiversidad local en los paisajes, siempre y cuando selvas remanentes en estos también sean conservadas.

    Français: Dans leur article sur la restauration des forêts soumises à la culture itinérante, Teegalapalli et ses coauteurs montrent que la culture itinérante est globalement considérée comme une cause essentielle de la déforestation. Mais la pratique se maintient car elle assure la subsistance de 300 à 500 millions de personnes à travers le monde et est étroitement liée aux traditions culturelles, écologiques et économiques des communautés. Les auteurs notent que, en ce qui concerne la surface terrière, la régénération et la quantité des espèces, il a été démontré que les jachères, qui font partie intégrante de la culture itinérante, permettent une reconstitution de la végétation plus rapide que dans les terres modifiées par l’homme puis abandonnées, comme les pâturages, les sites agroforestiers et les plantations. Ils soutiennent que la pratique de la culture itinérante peut être une pratique durable concourant à la biodiversité dans l’ensemble des situations lorsque l’on préserve de grandes portions de forêts matures.

    Português: Na sua revisão sobre a cobertura florestal após agricultura itinerante, Teegalapalli e co-autores demonstram que a agricultura itinerante é considerada como a maior responsável pelo desmatamento global, mas a prática persiste pois proporciona subsistência para pelo menos 300 a 500 milhões de pessoas no mundo e é intrinsecamente ligada aos aspectos culturais, ecológicos, e econômicos das comunidades. Os autores observaram que a agricultura itinerante tem mostrado recobrir a vegtação mais rapidamente em termos de área basal, regeneração, e acúmulo de espécies mais do que outros solos modifcados pelo homem e subsequentemente abandonados, como pastagens, agroflorestas e plantações. Eles argumentam que a prática da agricultura itinerante pode ser sustentável e suportar a biodiversidade em cenário global, se grandes porções de floresta relativamente maduras forem preservadas.


    Translation to French by Clément Lermyte, Spanish by Alejandro Estrada, Portuguese by Marina Lapenta

Reader comments are generally moderated. If you find something inappropriate, please contact Tropical Conservation Science.

The opinions expressed in reader comments are those of the author only, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of other authors or Tropical Conservation Science.




   Tropical Conservation Science is an open-access e-journal that publishes research relating to conservation of tropical forests and other tropical ecosystems.

Volume 2: Issue 4
Table of Contents

Articles
PDF


All issues
Mar 2008
Jun 2008
Sep 2008
Dec 2008

Mar 2009
Jun 2009
Sep 2009
Dec 2009

Mar 2010
Jun 2010
Sep 2010
Dec 2010

Mar 2011
Jun 2011
Sep 2011
Dec 2011

Mar 2012
Jun 2012
Sep 2012
Dec 2012

Mar 2013
Jun 2013
Aug 2013
Sep 2013
Nov 2013
Dec 2013

Mar 2014
Jun 2014
Sep 2014
Dec 2014

Mar 2015
Jun 2015
Sep 2015
Dec 2015

Mar 2016
Jun 2016


Most downloaded
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
All time


ADVERTISEMENT


SEARCH



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.



About | Privacy
Copyright mongabay.com 2008-2014